GraphicsMagick vs ImageMagick 压力测试原创

This page used to document benchmark results which compared GraphicsMagick 1.3.8 performance to ImageMagick 6.5.8-10 performance. We found that GraphicsMagick ...

GraphicsMagick is usually faster than ImageMagick. The baseline execution overhead for simple commands is much lower, and GraphicsMagick is also more efficient ...

2015年6月23日 — 另外，由于IM最近版本参数的变动，想找到一个很好方法对GM和IM进行压力测试，相对来说不是一件很容易的事情。

GraphicsMagick is a fork of ImageMagick, emphasizing stability of both programming API and command-line options. It was branched off ImageMagick's version ...

As you can see in SVN, I have reverted a couple performance optimizations for ImageMagick to bring back compatibility with some

2009年5月14日 — Other than speed, imagemagick adds a number of cli tools to terminal shell whereas graphicsmagick is a single tool which you can call. CLI ...

2015年9月17日 — To my mind, ImageMagick is the more flexible and powerful nowadays. I often see suggestions that GraphicsMagick is faster but I have not seen ...

2016年6月13日 — GraphicsMagick has a number of advantages compared to ImageMagick, the most prominent is it's superior performance.” -from im4java development ...

ImageMagick refers to 64 libraries for performing its work in a smooth manner but if it will tell you about GraphicsMagick then it requires 36 libraries.

2019年8月30日 — ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick are indeed very similar. For a lot of the capabilities GM is a drop-in replacement. Some of the wrapper ...